RedHack (Red Hackers Association) Since1997

For the world revolutionary public, #Anonymous component, member, supporters and friends; Press Release from RedHackers [26/03/2018]

Note: This article was written in November 2017 and has just been published. Reason of it is in the article why that is late.
For the world revolutionary public, Anonymous component, members, supporters and friends;
A short while ago from YAN (@YourAnonNews) account published that RedHack and Anonymous permanently broke their relationship. Before  this message, we would like to emphasize that, with this answer, we are not absolutely polemic, we want to avoid the practice of harming reputation of  Anonymous and RedHack.  Because we have such debates, before it is made public by Anonymous and Redhack “internal discussion” to be done as, (a tight argument, criticism and self-criticism after the manner of the sharpest mechanisms) however, if the problem cannot be solved, then declare our problems to the public “restrictedly”. It is a necessity for us to follow the revolutionary responsibilities. Who wants that  the enemy delights in thinking that we are falling on each other, pumping despair to the people of the world? Who could it be other than the enemy who wants it? We are sorry to say that, unfortunately, explanation  which is made  for the name of Anonymous  in YAN (@youranonnews) account, before  that also the explanation that Crypt0nymous (Cry) did (willingly-unintentionally) caused our enemies to rejoice.. Opening to the public the problems that we can resolve between us, without consulting us, with one-sided and limited knowledge, going even further announcing that for the name of Anonymous that they are put on suspend their relationship permanently with RedHack is regrettable for revolutionary responsibilities. It is even more sad that we have to write these lines in such a way that the public enemies can see them by forcing us to explain against it..
Valuable YourAnonNews (YAN) account administrators:
We’d like to tell you a little bit about what we’re up to. It is clear that you will not understand what we are saying until you understand which situation we are in. In Turkey, in which we live, we live to the very root of fascism, in such a way that even Hitler will have mercy. The fact that most journalists are arrested, people are imprisoned for expressing their views, tortured, forced to swear allegiance, the cost of being dissident, the cost of saying “We do not want you” to the government , we are faced with all kinds of dangers including the loss of our lives.  Journalists, lawyers, intellectuals, artists, representatives, everyone who can think of representing our society should be in front of the society, is being arrested in the slightest democratic demand, being taken from his home and being forced to flee Turkey, and some of them still resisting in Turkish prisons.
Over the last few years, more than 50 people, thought to be connected to RedHack, have been detained and 15 of them have been arrested.  Despite numerous operations, RedHack continued to take action. Still four journalists including Deniz Yücel are unlawfully detained in Turkish prisons for reporting the leak of Redhack’s government’s corruption. They kidnap people who they  think they belong to us in ways they do not have the slightest knowledge of where they are taken for months, the innocent people who are thought to be members of RedHack are exhibited in fascist accounts, their lives are endangered by targeting fascists, and innocent people are being criminalized. On dozens of platforms like Twitter-Facebook, our account is closed, access to our web sites we have opened is restricted, and the name RedHack is banned nationwide.  The newspapers can not even make our news out of fear, they are putting them in jail for saying “RedHack perception team.”  We don’t know whether we need to add that the people who are arrested, the victims, and the innocent people who are under arrest for Redhack are being tortured in disgust and unworthy of humanity, and believe me, we can’t end up counting what we’ve been through.. While the process has gone so badly, RedHack has been fighting for the peoples of the world for 20 years, for all its oppression, all operations, all foot games, all pressures.  Do we also need to explain how difficult it is to fight in a country where even the smallest of our news contributors have been plotting and causing trouble, where all the communication devices in the country are listened to, where everyone is seen as potential terrorists, where people are tortured, where we get up tomorrow morning and don’t know that how we wiil be or are we going tol ive or not?  We’re sure you’re reading all this from the news, but please take it as “pouring in”..  The fingers that write these lines are not certain what tomorrow will be like. It is very different to live apart from reading, believe in it sincerely.
You also know very well that if you are not accused of being imprisoned, disliked the government, open your unlimited and high-speed internet in a (minimum democratic) country that is accepted as “freedom of thought” and wear a V-mask to make news about operations or operations outside its own country , it is easy to tweet, so to be VendettaBut what about being a Vendetta in a country where a real Creddy lives? But what is it like to be a Vendetta in a country where torture is normalized by being thrown into close quarters with being tortured by police raids every night , without  a lawyer  of the Socialists, Anarchists, Kurds, Alevis, Women, LGBTI people, workers, Journalists, Academicians, in short, of all the otherrelated elements of society?
 While  it’s a big problem writing  even a single tweet  it takes days to prepare it ,  to do great actions and not get caught? And while all this is happening, the fact that you have to struggle for life, work to feed your stomach-the reality that you have to strive, the “principled” fact that your special problems are plentiful and that you can’t solve them by using your skills? We’d like you to look at it with some empathy. While you’re trying to keep your promise to the public,to protect your existence, to grow by taking risks, your friends  thinking  you’re making  mistake and they are turning their back to youPlease ask yourself and please make sure that we do not say what we say to insult anyone, to disrespect their struggle, as if we are in the worst situation, and that we do not try to humiliate you by saying that you are very comfortable, just to express our situation.  Otherwise, we know very well that our comrades from thousands of Anonymous people are working hard on similar conditions and paying a price, and our respect for them is endless.
Maintained a continuous presence for over 20 years as a hacktivist organization, of course, there has been our faults but our mistakes have never been of a quality to victimize our people or our friends.  As we have made great victories, as we have given hope to the people, there were also those who saw the power of the enemy and ran away from us, who had been defeated by the power of money, and who had given up on the power of the strong.  Just because we had the operation, there were some people who turned to their own pink-faced world and legitimized this tension by throwing mud at Redhack. In our 20-year history, there were renegades as well as heroes.  These are our history and things that might have happened..  But whatever it is, we are not in a position to bend our friend’s neck and make our enemy happy!  Therefore, we do not want to engage in a “back” discussion on the basis of Crypt0nymous (cry), which provides support for Yan (YourAnonNews).  Anyway childish debates  like; “You did it, I did it” do not fit neither RedHack nor Anonymous.  We will not engage in any kind of back-and-forth discussion, even if this situation born as a result of such discussion (even if they were not asked) by a statement published in the YAN account.  We will not respond to the explanation of “violating the rules of illegality” from the YAN account and endanger us, even though Crypt0nymous has threatened to “publish” our conversations in certain operations, such as “crypt0nymous” nor the YAN account it uses will not respond to the same act, and we will not make that mistake.  The person or persons who made the statement in Yan and cry’s own hasty statement show that they are reacting and do not even understand why they have stopped the relationship. It is normal that their haste and impulsive state, although they do not understand, is developed on the basis of love and personal belief in Cry, since it is clear that we are approaching Cry at this base, and we value Cry in spite of a lot of problems.  This is not because we have nothing to say, but rather because we have a lot to say. But it’s not here, it’s not time. We can’t discuss here any issue that could hole the illegality, lead to deciphering.  Our revolutionary principles do not allow this. But we need to make a small reminder on other issues, In Yan’s article, the point of not meeting Cry for 6 months is not true. Without a meeting  request, we can’t.  But let’s say we did not meet despite the demand, as you said, this should not be a problem, not 6 months,  even 16 months we could not be able to write, fascist rule in  country and we can’t go to an Internet cafe  and write “hello cry”  unfortunately. Besides, what’s the point in our relationship with cry? You don’t know this.  Cry, was “just” a support account  that supports RedHack,  two years ago they said: “I want to move with Anonymous and support you from there”.   In other words, when we have no organizational relationship with Cry, we had a nervous Cry, who finds himself in a position to ask “asking questions” or even “asking for an account”. The RedHack organization has the right not to answer these questions.  We don’t think we’re going to tell someone outside our organization about our organizational status and our secrets just because they helped us? We do not have any responsibility and concern for those who are outside our organization, those who try to undermine the illegality of our organization, those who try to resolve their personal curiosity, and our regulation prohibits such situations.  First of all, we expect you to ask Cry why he is an enemy of Redhack and why he is in relationship with Redhack enemies. While there was no organizational relationship with RedHack how does Cry have the right to ask for an account as if there was an organizational relationship? It gives the impression that he is “doing his own” actions while they were only helping to RedHack for  announcing closed accounts and a help in logistics (account opening, announcement etc.) issues? He mentions that an account has been decrypted, that Redhack’s password has never been cracked or hacked. Who is the one who opened up the account that revealed  innocent people who sympathized with RedHack? Please ask this to Cry. Did RedHack  opened it or is it out of control/knowledge of RedHack? If RedHack didn’t open it, who did then? If RedHack did not open it,  does RedHack responsible for the accounts opened for RedHack? Ask this to them.  In addition, in your article, you said, “how the account of the 20-year organization was hacked, so we’re cutting it off,” this account that doesn’t belong to us could be hacked, and while we’re bombing a place, someone could bomb us too. We don’t have stupid egos like “we don’t get hacked.” We are fighting and we see this war as a whole, not as parts. As we say, there is no hacking. In this account, which is said to be hacked and not opened by RedHack, when names are given, Cry’s name, which is clear that he is telling everyone his whereabouts, is not given, and this fascism has been passed  only on to him. What is the reason of fascism’s “favor” to Cry? We have 2 accounts and other accounts have been closed by Twitter at the request of the Turkish government. Who is giving Cry the right to “claim the account” claiming to be hacked when we do not have a hacked account? What is the reason that in his own Twitter account, he perceived that we didn’t respond as “afraid” and threw threatening tweets and tried to weaken Redhack in front of the enemy?  Serves what?  What is the reason why, by gossiping, he tries to decipher the people who have repeatedly proven innocence, who have been victimized by the police, as “in one-to-one conversations,” with accusations of innocence, to target fascism and “this is actually what it is”? If innocent people are arrested for these expressions of Cry, will Cry be able to give us and the revolutionaries the account?  What is the reason for this “sudden” changes in Cry, angry and whatever we say, the ego of “Don’t think of yourself as something” threatens us with Anonymous and Yan by saying, “face with YAN not with me”, that he thinks  Anonymous is his father’s farm, which is strange and childish? Not being a point in life?

Well, I’m sorry, but for us, with their selfish attitude, it’s only a comma in this life. Although we have sent a message to Julian Assange and Wikileaks, why didn’t we get our messages, why did we get a “false information” about Julian Assange, egoist populist etc? Please ask him what is the reason of being together with people who are making fake rumors about people who cant be here and cant talk here but who helped to Redhack in last 3 years even if they dont have any relationship with organization. There are many similar questions, you ask them.  Take the answer yourself and discuss it within yourself, for we do not find it right to open a new polemic by giving us the answer, which is only for you to find the answer to the questions in your mind, and for us It is about to be clarified.  We don’t want Redhack illegality and our inner rules to overwhelm you, and we don’t want to do it in front of the enemy.  We hope that you understand that, to avoid damaging both Cry and YAN, to make the enemy even more welcome, we say again; we will not go into this issue deeply.  But it is not acceptable to try to test our “sensitive” silence.  In the name of Anonymous, we want the mobilization of Anonymous labourers to end and the observance of the Anonymous principles. Finally, let’s just say that taking a stance on Cry or on the “personal” look of Cry to us, without asking  us a single  question, breaking your relationship with RedHack, is lacking in science. It is true that we were angry with cry at the time that these problems (there are reasonable reasons we did not explain here) were a problem that could be solved between us, we have the right to be angry from his ridiculous-meaningless attitude because of our deep and strong friendship, also with Anonymous (which is much earlier than Cry), no one has the right to weaken the world revolutionary fundamentalist movement with its head-arm relations and feudal attitudes.  This is an attitude that does not fit into our friendship relationship until many years, apart from being deprived of Science. This situation has upset us more than anything else. What we need most is that those who turn their backs have what we call a friend has injured us.. We say this with all sincerity, so please consider this with all sincerity. We insist that it is our debt to the peoples of the world that you return from the stance and the attitude that makes us all sad and busy.

Note: If you want to know more, we can only clarify the situation by writing a special article for you, but we underline that we do not want to write openly in front of the enemy until the end.  It is our hope that you will answer the questions we ask you in yourself and open a “special” channel accordingly. No one should drop us in a position to please the enemy. Don’t let him drop you.
Dear members of Anonymous, the Anonymous Family, our Hacktivist friends and the world revolutionary movement:
In a statement made in the name of Anonymous and published by Yan, RedHack was said to have been disconnected, whereas RedHack saw himself as part of Anonymous, whereas  Anonymous  call us “Us”, we cannot understand how we are disconnected from what we are already subject to when the Turkish government judges that they are not only from Redhack but also from AnonymousWho gives this authority to the YAN account? While Anonymous member are paying  prices, only for that a Twitter account has too many followers,  are they able to establish a relationship with what they want on behalf of Anonymous?  Isn’t that contrary to the Anonymous philosophy?  Despite all the negativities (within Anonymous), we are not going to open these negativities as we have said), We have participated in all the operations we can, and we have defended Anonymous everywhere. We did not receive any helpfrom YAN, other than the press and media announcements, the action news, the announcements of our closed accounts and the access to Wikileaks. We have carried out all the actions we have carried out so far without the assistance of an external power or any other Imperial power, only by relying on our own power, and even by the actions that Anonymous has initiated against Turkey, in the name of Anonymous, even when there was no one left to initiate the operation.  Because we’re Anonymous, Redhack in Anonymous. Because we do not have “you” or “we”.  As long as we work for the benefit of the people, as long as we have hope for the people, it doesn’t matter what our name is for us or whether or not our name is for us.  Therefore, it is sad that our relationship with RedHack, our other family, on behalf of the Anonymous family, is broken, but also contrary to the basic principles of Anonymous. Anyone who feels Anonymous, who fights injustice under the name Anonymous, who obeys the basic principles of Anonymous is Anonymous. To put Anonymous in moulds, to appoint a leader to Anoymous, to determine  the attitude of Anonymous with that leader, to take what we like in the name of Anonymous, to expel what we don’t like, etc.,  petty bourgeois attitudes is to ignore Anonymous at all, and even to turn Anonymous upside down. We sincerely declare this to all our Anonymous member brothers and sisters.
Unfortunately, Yan’s long-term dysfunctional posture has led to the forgetting of anonymous’s general principles, or to the fact that people who never knew Anonymous have authorized Yan’s Twitter account. It is our greatest wish that YAN returned from this mistake. Because today, we have to be more united, we have to show our solidarity and approach each other with more understanding, we can not even make sense of the purpose of this “separation” practice which makes our enemies very happy. We believe that this attitude, rather than the presence of Redhack, has damaged our “own” rooftop Organization, Anonymous. We leave it to the discretion of all our Anonymous members,  our revolutionaries, hacktivists and friends who look for a YAN account; what will gain Anonysmous from isolating Anonymous in the World or who will want Anonymous or Redhack to stay alone? Given in detail, we believe it can be understood.
While there was a Sabu example trying to contact us on behalf of Anonymous, earning our trust and trying to sell us to the FBI on the same trip as Jeremy, RedHack has been around all over the place, we have continued to trust and link to Anonymous’s high accounts, defending Anonymous to the end as if nothing had happened.  But we see that some of them are still unable to learn from Sabu and many infiltration attempts after that. Nevertheless, we continue to say loudly, “we are anonymous”, because Anonymous is an issue. What should not be lost is a strong position that pumps hope to the peoples of the world. Even if this position  says “you are no longer us,” we will continue to say that we are Anonymous, to act for Anonymous, to watch Anonymous’s interests, “we are Anonymous.” So we won’t go even if they tell us to go.. If we discharge this position, it is clear that our enemies will fill the empty space and use it for their own interests. Unfortunately, this has been seen in history, as we all know. For these reasons, we invite all revolutionary public opinion, socialists, revolutionaries to adopt more anonymous, and to practice more Anonymous.  Now, the urgency is not to engage in childish discussion with each other, not  to exulcerate our organization, not to spread despair to our peoples, but to reintroduce the revolutionary principles of Anonymous and to strive to play the role of a true fundamentalist who does not compromise with the system. So now everyone has to be Anonymous, get the Anonymous component up, and we are calling for revolutionary hacktivists.  Anonymous is all of us, RedHack is all of us!
We want the esteemed Anonymous family to have their prisoners, no matter who they are, who are practicing practices that destroy unity, harm solidarity, make the enemy laugh and establish a true solidarity.

It is now time for the rulers to reject this game, and to write our own destiny, and to determine it, and it is time to stand up and be shaken.  Now is the time to take the world, which is ours, from the bourgeois crooks disguised as politicians, not individual and petty discussions that break the union. Anonymous should now get rid of childish tendencies and be the hope for the people of the world again, so we will do our best, we promise!  Our expectation is that you, our distinguished members of Anonymous, will condemn this childish situation and the populist approach that disrupts this Union, and they will put forward the principles of real Anonymous. We don’t have time to deal with each other, now we must embrace unity, solidarity and victory with all our strength. The day is not the break-up, but the day of increasing the same. The day is the day to destroy this theatrical comedy of a handful of parasites, where they see the world as their own farms and the peoples of the world as their own sheep.  We want all the friends with this concern to help  Anonymous to reintroduce. We can do that, we believe!

From various nationalities to the self-sacrificing  peoples of Turkey;
You are deeply dedicated to the recent processes that redhack has experienced, and we think that you are anticipating how hard we have been through, and we thank our devoted people for their help.  But besides these benefits, people who see great bounty with  the slightest help or even a single tweet should  know that;  we do not ask you to give us applause or glorify us, all we ask is that you understand what is being done, respect the labor and the price we payWe want you to know that the attitudes approaching us, such as in the slightest negativity, when we are comfortable, we judge people who are not comfortable and pay the price, who see the RedHack struggle as a “goal-throwing” struggle, and who shape everything that redhack has to do, as if we were paid employees, is causing us a lot of harm and upset. How are we supposed to be successful, both in the fight against the enemy and in the attitudes of people trying to disrupt our morale? No support, but no hindrances, please, is that too hard?
For 20 years, we have been in the processes that everyone swears to us, and in the processes that the majority praiseus. But both of them are not important to us.  No one can buy our hate with his hatred, nor the love of us with his love. Because for us, It’s not important that people know the name of Redhack or Anonymous, but that they wake up, question, and perform their own duties..  On this basis  you  own us and approach revolutionary principles, we are not all alone at RedHack at Anonymous, we are all. We can’t get freedom by running away from our own duties. We can only get freedom when we fight togetherRevolutionary struggle is not a struggle made by a handful of elites but a struggle in which the people are the “subject” in this struggle, that the people have won  by putting their hand under the stone.  Revolution and freedom are not given to us on the gold platter, both Anonymous and Redhack can’t give it to us , we go and take it back from who took away from us by force. Difficult beats difficult.  That’s why everyone have to know and do their duty. We ask that you, our beautiful people, should help us on this basis and strengthen our goal of spreading our struggle to the masses. If the absence of Redhack and Anonymous will make you more revolutionary , we will cease our existence without thinking.  But we still need Redhack and Anonymous. We say this not as Redhack or Anonymous, but as socialist revolutionaries who think we really need it. Now, please let us realize that, let us stand up! If not today, then when?
Redhack members, candidate members and sympathizers,
After all the operations that RedHack experienced, we came to the conclusion that the accounts opened for  RedHack and termed “support account” must be terminated. These support accounts opened on behalf of RedHack are very useful for RedHack, as well as the problems we have mentioned above (YAN related issues) that can cause problems.  In addition, these beautiful people, who have no organizational ties with us, whose sole purpose is to support us, can be declared Redhack by the government and detained and imprisoned.  For this reason, we decided to close all accounts except official accounts Redhack, and only base the views of the main accounts (@Kizilhack @TheRedhack and @RedHackGroup) on RedHack. Unfortunately, it is clear that such accounts, which have contributed greatly to the spread of our news in a period of time, now have very negative effects on our struggle. We want to thank to our comrades who use these accounts for their labor but we can no longer tolerate them going to jailjust because they used this name.
Also, unfortunately, we will not allow some populist malicious people (even a very small sample)  who use RedHack support accounts to take their place over Redhack’s wages, and to provide various benefits over Redhack , if necessary we will expose them  to the individual revolutionary public.  We’re not joking about it. In the past and today, no account opened on behalf of RedHack, except the main accountsdoes not connect to Redhack.  Those who act with the name RedHack other than the main accounts are not related to RedHack. Redhack can be put on bio or profile photos, but please don’t believe to the mean people who;  abuse Redhack’s illegality and lack of Redhack on other social platforms except  Twitter, gives self-impression that they are Redhack as a support account, provides place by saying “we are this”, makes himself a “political career” or collects material gain by using name of Redhack, had no other benefit other than tweeting for RedHack, but organizing a faction as a RedHack member or a former member, show themselves as RedHack on external platforms, such as Twitter Facebook or Instagram other than main Twitter accounts,  puts Red in front of their names,  exhibit Redhack attitude and get personal interest, raise fund by saying “I’m actually that guy and I got cancer”. We are deeply convinced that all our comrades will do their part on this issue, and we owe thousands of thanks to all our working-class friends who are paying the price and spreading the redhack struggle for a period of time with support accounts.
All comrades; should work harder , for our country for a 2. breakthrough after the Gezi,  for World 2.   October Revolution, acting on the agenda of revolutionary institutions, in our country Nuriye Gülmen and Semih Özakça, in the World Jeremy Hammond and Julian Assange, the great revolutionary will of revolutionaries and  dissidents that  show in prisons and  in custody standing firmly, we invite you once again to spread all over the world through the cables.
RedHack is a red Scarlet that goes clean in the history book and no matter what the public enemies do, history has already been written in the hearts of our comrades..  It’s time to rise again stronger.  This is not a luxury this is a task, so we invite all comrades to keep our promise to the people no matter what the end, crowning the honourable struggle of RedHack and Anonymous with greater action.  Even if we are destroyed tomorrow, they will continue this struggle, and we trust our people and our comrades..

Note: In a short time, we will publish a newsletter about redhack actions and orientations and about the positive/negative developments in the last period..

Wait for us. And remember,
No matter what happens, we win!
“we love you very much”
Down with fascism, chauvinism, capitalism, feudalism and all sorts of reactionaries!
Long live, struggle and solidarity of the Hacktivists!
Long live Revolutionary Solidarity!
Long live Anonymous!
Long live RedHack!
Long live Hacktivism!
Long live Freedom, equality and class brotherhood!
We Don’t Forget, We Don’t Forgive, We Don’t Compromise!
“You can stop one of us, but never all of us”
Hack for the people
Against to the facism hooray RedHack!
RedHack (Kızıl Hackerlar Birliği- RedHackers Association) and
On behalf of Anonymous Turkey
RedHack/MK (Central Committee)

Anonymous launch Brazilian Corrupt Public Sector Entities Data Leak

In an astonishing move, Anonymous leak public sector entities infrastructure topology data for the people of Brazil in the midst of Lava Jato scandal.

The compromised data includes IP addresses from the public sector, ranging law enforcement agencies and local municipality. This data leak comes at a moment where a strong fight against corruption is taking place.

The data leak represents a lack of maturity in adopting a framework, like NIST, for maintaining the secret of information in today’s country information technology marketplace.

Nowadays, it may seem quite usual see these events take place in the evolving, and changing, the threat landscape of digital menaces, but it was expected to take place as hackers usually comes with new attacks as the year approaches its end.

The data reveal in high details, how is structured the network topology of critical services infrastructure including routers, firewalls and other open services.

It is important to notice that all IP ranges from São Paulo military and civil police was leaked, including servers related to public identification and public safety. The compromised data also describes the police servers entirely exposing not only the identity of every police officer, but also the entire public security office.

As it is presented with a message, the intent of the hackers were in the fight against corruption in Brazil, where it took a new ground: the 5th domain. The cyber domain has reached the public opinion where the scrutinity of the society claiming for justice can be reached on the click of a mouse. These corrupt law enforcement agencies are globally known to be involved in extortion, drug traffic dealing, murdering, oppression, violation of the United Nations Human Rights and violence against minorities like black people and homosexuals alike.

The fight against corruption, abuse of power and authority can be a new front line to Lava Jato operation, including the police of the state of São Paulo, where the population lives as hostages to the public service colluding with the organized crime. As shown in the media outlets this week, a strong instance must be taken to reach out the public demands of justice and morality in the tax paid from every citizen.

This single event brings forth an important question: The importance of developing and implementing a security framework like NIST to address the cyber security on ICS/SCADA industrial control system. It is important to notice that the framework is structured in such way that it can be adapted to the existing current model in use. The critical infrastructure, in the face of today’s challenge of information security, must address rogue nation’s threat like North Korea and China.

The data leak is available at the following URL

Il governo minaccia 40 anni di carcere; Matt DeHart  è costretto a patteggiare

Secondo l’accordo, Matt dovrà dichiararsi colpevole di aver usato la pornografia teen, composta da messaggi datati dal 2008 che il governo degli Stati Uniti ha deciso di caricare anni dopo dopo che sono venuti a sapere che Matt scoprì dei file militari sensibili e che erano stati caricati su un server online  e che fosse un sostenitore di Wikileaks e Anonymous.

Matt potrebbe combattere le accuse in tribunale, ma ha già sopportato abusi sostanziali e il giudice si è affiancato alle posizioni del  governo quasi ogni seduta . Più di recente, il giudice di Matt ha  respinto una motione della difesa  basata su accuse di vendetta e persecuzione. Inoltre, il sistema giudiziario federale è intasato  e il tasso di condanna nelle prove penali federali è del 93%.

Il padre di Matt, Paul DeHart, ha citato il caso di Aaron Swartz come punto di svolta nella paura della famiglia di un processo aggressivo  Swartz si è suicidato dopo avera rischiato una condanna a più di 50 anni in carcere per un download di documenti JSTOR disponibili pubblicamente .Allo stesso modo, nel caso di Matt, il governo minaccia una sentenza di lunga scadenza di molti decenni – una condanna altamente sproporzionata per le accuse che gli sono mosse.

Il governo è probabilmente d’accordo su questo accordo fatto con il caso di Matt DeHart, per impedire un processo  in cui potrebbe emergere l’attività politica di Matt, i file che ha scoperto e il trattamento che ha sopportato.

L’accordo non è la fine della storia: come dice l’avvocato di Matt Tor Ekeland, “il tribunale non è vincolato dalle raccomandazioni del governo e può imporre alcuna frase che desideri al massimo statutario. Normalmente, tuttavia, i tribunali denunciano secondo i parametri di un accordo di accusa tra il governo e l’imputato “.

Inoltre, dobbiamo prevenire futuri ritorsioni, come il confino solitario di Barrett Brown, Chelsea Manning e Jeremy Hammond. Matt è già stato torturato durante l’interrogatorio e imprigionato per anni prima del processo. Dobbiamo tenere la sentenza di Matt sotto la costante dell’opinione pubblica, poiché solo un controllo significativo impedirà ulteriori abusi e assicurarando il più giusto processo possibile.

Fonte Courage Fondation

Sono un hacker in prigione, non sono un criminale. Sono un attivista Jeremy Hammond

 In carcere, mi è stato chiesto molto sull’hacking e soprattutto su’Anonymous , perché ovviamente c’è interesse per nuove tecnologie come Bitcoin per soldi o scure per frode.  Dopo tutto, i detenuti – come gli hacker – sviluppano i propri codici e l’etica e stanno costantemente cercando modi di truffa e sfruttare le crepe nel sistema.

Il messaggio anti-governo dell’Anonymous anonima vera tra i prigionieri che sono stati feriti, condannati e immagazzinati. . Quindi, quando senti parlare di siti web governativi e di poliziotti impacciati, i miei colleghi spesso mi dicono cose come: “È bello vedere che le persone finalmente fanno qualcosa”. Quel rifiuto di stabiliti percorsi riformisti per raggiungere il cambiamento sociale è il motivo per cui Anonymous continua come forza da tenere conto,questo  è reso ancora più evidente dalla presenza di maschere di Guy Fawkes alle proteste di Ferguson, nel Missouri – e oltre.

Gli hacker sono un gruppo controverso, caotico e comunemente frainteso.  Molti di noi sono stati arrestati, da Mercedes Haefer e Andrew Auernheimer a Mustafa Al-Bassam e altri e pochi osservatori esterni ottengono che Anonymous non è un’entità monolitica ma un ampio spettro di sfondi, politiche e tattiche.  E così ho condiviso un nuovo libro con i miei compagni di stato dall’antropologo e l’autrice Gabriella Coleman ha chiamato Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous .

 Il libro cronizza lo sviluppo di Anonymous dai suoi giorni di truffatori truccati al suo coinvolgimento in Occupy Wall Street e nella primavera araba, alle sfide di hacking di LulzSec e AntiSec e di tutte le parole fatte dal gruppo da Stratfor, l’azienda di intelligence che ho attaccato nel 2012. Ma è più che una scadenza scritta da un outsider: Coleman ha trascorso anni in decine di chat room e ha viaggiato nel mondo per incontrare hacker. Alcuni, come i miei seguaci di LulzSec nel Regno Unito, non ho sentito parlare da quando abbiamo collaborato a vari hack e successivi arresti, quindi sono stato particolarmente felice di sapere come hanno mantenuto vivo lo spirito.

Sono stato particolarmente colpito dalle interazioni di Coleman con Hector Monsegur, ovvero Sabu, informatore dell’FBI, che è responsabile di molti dei nostri arresti e che è stato rilasciato questa primavera dopo la sua “straordinaria collaborazione” con l’FBI .  Una delle poche persone che lo incontrassero faccia a faccia fino a quando non ha dato un’intervista a Charlie Rose questo mese, Coleman ha avuto sensazioni che sono parallele a me: Sabu mi ha tradito.

Come tutti gli altri , Coleman era convinta della credibilità di strada di Sabu perché parlò duramente e si vantava del suo accesso alle continue operazioni di hacking. . Sì, io sono un leader nativo , lui direbbe.  Posso condurre tutto questo movimento da solo se voglio vivere come un dittatore. Che cazzo c’è con tutti i ronzio? Leggendo queste e centinaia di altre citazioni infuriative in retrospettiva, si pone la domanda: come avremmo potuto essere così stupidi?

Coleman sostiene che questo “avanguardismo dell’hacker” – basandosi su un numero scelto per fare tutti gli attacchi o agire come portavoce – è stato disatteso dalla meritocrazia populista di Anonymous e ci ha lasciato più vulnerabili all’infiltrazione e all’arresto.

 Nonostante la “Sabutage”, la fase 2011 AntiSec di Anonymous – quando un piccolo ma efficace gruppo di noi ha assunto tutti da Sony a Fox News – potrebbe essere stato il periodo più attivo ed efficace del movimentoAll’altezza di Occupy Wall Street, Anon stava guadagnando l’esperienza di protesta  e la maturità politica.  Gli hack si sono scalati in numero e in gravità, puntando sui simboli della disuguaglianza economica e la brutalità della polizia e in molti modi Anonimi si stava diventando più decentralizzato, più aperto e sufficientemente tatticamente diversificato per rappresentare il futuro del hattivismo – e forse anche parte del futuro Dell’attivismo.

Il libro di Coleman non è un’approvazione indiscussa: non siamo sempre legali e siamo spesso casuali, incoerenti e politicamente inesatti... Persone come Sabu non lo fanno e anche i procuratori anti-hacker non ne hanno certamente.

Siamo condannati come criminali senza coscienze, licenziati come ragazzi anti-sociali senza una causa, o sospesi come cyber-terroristi per giustificare lo stato di sorveglianza in espansione.  Ma l’ hacktivismo esiste all’interno della storia dei movimenti della giustizia sociale. L’ hacktivismo è ancora il futuro, ed è bene vedere che la gente continua a fare qualcosa.